Their testimony may be viewed as partial, so it's crucial to consider their role carefully. However, it's essential to recognize that an ex-spouse is inherently biased as they are intimately tied to the opposing party. While this may seem unusual, it highlights an important aspect of divorce and custody cases – the potential involvement of exes in supporting one's position.Įx-spouses can serve as valuable witnesses in divorce and custody cases, provided they possess pertinent information or have witnessed significant events relevant to the case. In recent celebrity news, the public witnessed Sophie Turner, a prominent actress, engaging in friendly dinners with her husband Joe Jonas' ex-partner, Taylor Swift. ![]() While exes can sometimes offer valuable insights, it's crucial to understand their role, potential biases, and the significance of recent information. ![]() One intriguing aspect of this process, exemplified by celebrity cases like that of Sophie Turner, involves seeking support and testimony from the exes of the opposing party. The ultimate goal is to present a comprehensive and accurate picture of the situation to the court, should a hearing become necessary. Call us today at (732) 529-6937 to talk about your case.In the complex world of divorce and child custody cases, gathering vital information and securing witnesses is an ongoing endeavor. Helping to guide our clients through complicated evidentiary issues, including child testimony and hearsay. It is often advisable to avoid having children testify in court, especially if a child is very young, so any decision to have a child testify needs to be made carefully with an attorney’s advice. If there is no corroborating evidence, it may be necessary to have the child testify in court. Accordingly, one child’s statement will be insufficient to support such a finding unless other evidence is introduced to support that child’s claim. Where these statements are being introduced to support a finding of abuse or neglect, then the statements must be corroborated. ![]() For example, if child discloses that a parent physically abuses the child, then it may be possible to have those statements introduced as evidence without actually having the child present to testify. If a child’s hearsay statement is concerning allegations of abuse or neglect, then the out of court statement may be admissible even though it is hearsay. New Jersey rule of evidence 9:6-8 provides an important exception to the hearsay rule for children. If hearsay is introduced, the parties do not have the ability to question the person who originally made the statement, as the only person present in court to talk about what was said is a person who is simply repeating a statement made out of court. The reason for the hearsay rule is that parties have the right to cross-examine someone who is making statements in court. In other words, if a child’s statement of "My mommy drinks beer all day" is introduced at trial for the purpose of proving the mother does indeed drink beer all day, that is hearsay and is generally inadmissible. Hearsay is any statement made out of court which is introduced at court in order to prove the truth of the matter asserted in that statement. This is typically not permitted, as it is hearsay. In some cases, parents will want to testify to what a child has told them about the other parent or about an incident. Parents will need to bring as much evidence as possible to a final hearing, including documents, videos, and witnesses to testify on their behalf. ![]() Every parent just wants a result that is best for the child, but parents will often have very differing ideas on what is best. Custody battles can be some of the most hard-fought and contentious court cases.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |